The Rapidian Home

Public responds to second night of "Why These Finalists" discussion

This dispatch was added by one of our Nonprofit Neighbors. It does not represent the editorial voice of The Rapidian or Community Media Center.

[VIDEO] Right after watching the second night of "Why These Finalists,", these respondents stopped to share their own insights and learning.
Underwriting support from:

/Eric Tank

/Eric Tank

Tuesday night's Critical Discourse panel- Nicole Caruth, Digital Content Editor forART21, Mia Lopez, Curatorial Fellow at the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis and Paddy Johnson, founding editor of Art F City- analyzed the top selections by both jurors and the public vote. They shared what worked for them in the pieces as well as where they saw need for improvement in the 2-D and Installation category selections from both the jurors and the public.

Directly following the event, the public was invited to respond to their thoughts and the event itself. 

This video is a collection of responses to the Critical Discourse: Why These Finalists? Part 1 (3-D, Time-Based) event on Tuesday, October 7. 

Immediately following the program, two response stations were available for anyone to step in front of the camera and respond to anything discussed by the panelists. Whether in agreement or disagreement, all voices were welcomed to share their thoughts.

The response stations were available at each Critical Discourse event, and broadcast here on The Rapidian the following day.

The Rapidian, a program of the 501(c)3 nonprofit Community Media Center, relies on the community’s support to help cover the cost of training reporters and publishing content.

We need your help.

If each of our readers and content creators who values this community platform help support its creation and maintenance, The Rapidian can continue to educate and facilitate a conversation around issues for years to come.

Please support The Rapidian and make a contribution today.

Comments, like all content, are held to The Rapidian standards of civility and open identity as outlined in our Terms of Use and Values Statement. We reserve the right to remove any content that does not hold to these standards.